Los Angeles, CA vs San Francisco, CA
Cost of Living Comparison
San Francisco, CA is 8% more expensiveLos Angeles, CA
166.2
Difference
+8%
San Francisco, CA
179.6
Category-by-Category Breakdown
| Category | Los Angeles, CA | San Francisco, CA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 166.2 | 179.6 | +8% |
| Housing | 244.6 | 295.8 | +21% |
| Groceries | 112.7 | 119.3 | +6% |
| Transportation | 135.4 | 131.5 | -3% |
| Healthcare | 109.4 | 115.7 | +6% |
| Utilities | 120.2 | 124.1 | +3% |
| Miscellaneous | 112.8 | 115.2 | +2% |
Salary Equivalent: Los Angeles, CA to San Francisco, CA
To maintain the same standard of living, here's what you'd need to earn:
| Salary in Los Angeles, CA | Equivalent in San Francisco, CA | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $54,031 | +$4,031 |
| $75,000 | $81,047 | +$6,047 |
| $100,000 | $108,063 | +$8,063 |
| $125,000 | $135,078 | +$10,078 |
| $150,000 | $162,094 | +$12,094 |
| $200,000 | $216,125 | +$16,125 |